Translate

Monday, 10 May 2021

The Case of the Missing Isotopes - The Ultimate Proof of an Ancient Earth

Given that the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old, we would not expect to find any radioactive isotopes with short half-lives in the crust of the Earth as they would have long since decayed away. Conversely, if the Earth really was six thousand years old, then we'd expect to find these short-lived radioactive isotopes as insufficient time would have passed for them to have decayed away. When we examine the Earth's crust to look for short-lived radioactive isotopes, apart from those naturally made, we find no short-lived isotopes, just what we'd expect if the Earth was ancient.

In his book The Age of the Earth [1], respected geologist G. Brent Dalrymple looks at this splendid demonstration of the antiquity of the Earth. He remarks

There are 34 unstable nuclides with half-lives greater than 1 Ma [Table 1]. Of these, 23 are found in nature. Five of the 23, however are continually being produced by natural nuclear reactions...The 17 remaining radioactive nuclides all have half-lives of 82 Ma or more. The absence of short-lived unstable nuclides in nature holds true even if the list in [Table 1] is extended to include nuclides with half-lives less than 1Ma; only those whose existence is due to continual production by natural processes (or in some cases by man) are found. How can this most logically be explained? [2]

 Table 1- Known radioactive isotopes with half-lives greater than one million years

Nuclide

Half-Life (Years)

Found in Nature?

50V

6x1015

yes

144Nd

2.4x1015

yes

174Hf

2x1015

yes

192Pt

~1x1015

yes

115In

6x1014

yes

152Gd

1.1x1014

yes

123Te

1.2x1013

yes

190Pt

6.9x1011

yes

138La

1.12x1011

yes

147Sm

1.06x1011

yes

87Rb

4.88x1010

yes

187Re

4.3x1010

yes

176Lu

3.5x1010

yes

232Th

1.4x1010

yes

238U

4.47x109

yes

40K

1.25x109

yes

235U

7.04x108

yes

244Pu

8.2x107

yes

146Sm

7x107

no

205Pb

3x107

no

236U

2.39x107

yes – naturally made

129I

1.7x107

yes – naturally made

247Cm

1.6x107

no

182Hf

9x106

no

107Pd

~7x106

no

53Mn

3.7x106

yes – naturally made

135Cs

3x106

no

97Tc

2.6x106

no

237Np

2.14x106

yes – naturally made

150Gd

2.1x106

no

10Be

1.6x106

yes – naturally made

93Zr

1.5x106

no

98Tc

1.5x106

no

154Dy

~1x106

no

Dalrymple advances three hypotheses to explain this:

1. Chance
2. The processes that formed the elements were unable to make short-lived isotopes
3. The earth is billions of years old and the short-lived isotopes have decayed away

Dalrymple calculates the odds that purely by chance the Earth's crust has the long-lived isotopes and none of the short-lived isotopes  as 1 chance in 9x107. He notes that the odds become even worse when we factor in all the radioactive isotopes with even shorter half-lives. After around 10 half-lives, a radioisotope will have decayed away to an undetectable quantity. If the Earth was - say - ten thousand years old, then we'd expect to be able to detect all the radiioisotopes with half-lives greater than one thousand years. The odds blow out to one chance in 3x1014. As slim as those odds are, Dalrymple notes that the calculations should properly include the 269 stable isotopes found in the crust as well as those radioisotopes with long half-lives. When this is done, the odds that the Earth is young but by chance none of the short-lived radioisotopes are present drop to an improbable 1 chance in 1053. These odds are so small that we can effectively dismiss the chance that the earth really is young but all the short-lived radioisotopes that we'd expect not to have decayed away purely by chance are missing.

What about the possibility that the process that forms elements is incapable of making short-lived radioisotopes? Dalrymple notes [3] that short-lived radioisotopes can be detected in stars. They can also be formed in nuclear reactors. Thus, there seems to be no barrier to the synthesis of short-lived radioisotopes. Therefore, the only credible explanation for why we find no short-lived radioisotopes in the crust of the Earth is that the Earth is old, and all these short-lived isotopes have decayed away. The Earth truly is ancient.

References

1. G, Brent Dalrymple The Age of the Earth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991
2. ibid, p 376
3. ibid, p 379